Tuesday 24 September 2013

Open Access and the Allegations of Predatory Publishing

The open access model of publishing is the latest and quite useful addition to the publishing industry.
Despite resistance from certain quarters, it continues to develop and receive acceptance from 
the academia and the industry. In view of this, the reaction of the traditional publisher to this model of publishing is apprehensive and they consider it to be a threat to their existence.
Unrestricted and free utilization of research publications, especially to the third world, will in 
general serve the very objective of scientific research and scientific publication. If the quality of publications can in fact be maintained, the Open Access will truly live up to its promise.

Bentham Science Publishers is an established name in the industry. Their publications include numerous respectable titles, such as Current Medicinal Chemistry, Current Pharmaceutical Design, Current Gene Therapy, Current Drug Metabolism and many more. Bentham Scienec Publishers have two main categories of publishing: subscription based journals that include many high impact titles; and Open Access which publishes popular titles such as The Open Dentistry Journal and The Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal. Nearly all their journals, both subscriptions based and Open Access, are indexed in internationally recognized indexing agencies like Scopus, Medline, EMBASE and PubMed etc.
The authors who have contributed in Bentham journals are quite satisfied with their publication process and peer review procedure. You can check the author testimonials at:
Unfortunately, Bentham Open has also been the target of Bentham controversy for some time. These allegations in fact are not grounded in reality. Bentham Open is actually charging quite an affordable fee for open access as compared to other known publishers and, in case of authors from the developing world; the publisher makes it totally free for the contributor. For more information, you can check:


Open Access Publishing has also generated some controversies but this is to be expected in a new publication model. There are always some teething problems in the initial stage of anything and fine tuning is always required. Compared to over five hundred years of traditional publishing models, Open Access is still a new born baby and has to be nurtured in good faith. There is a concerted effort going on out there by unknown quarters to try and discredit this form of publishing but if that happens, it would be to the detriment of the scientists and researchers. Blind acceptance of whatever is published against Open Access must be resisted with an open mind

No comments:

Post a Comment